Paya Holdings (PAYA) is a stock to look at

Paya Holdings (PAYA) a stock with juicy profit margins, crazy revenue growth, and an asymmetric gain opportunity in the short term because calls are cheap, with whales already jumping in slapping big dick energy down on OTM calls.

Eerily, this stock has not been mentioned on reddit or any of the regular places I check for mentions, even though they 1) murked earnings and raised guidance, 2) analysts keep upgrading their PTs, 3) announced on Friday a cashless redemption catalyst on Sep 10, and 4) institutions are loaded to the tits with shares (118%+)

This institutional share anomaly will be deep dived later – but surprise surprise, since the institutions who own all the shares are investment management firms who generally buy and hold, the float is illiquid; since, without an actively traded float there is essentially no float. Lastly as always there is a short angle for extra salt.

When you read this DD remember the video I posted; people are watching đź‘€, so take profits this time and cut your losses if you FOMO in at the last second. I wouldn’t be posting or throwing money down on calls unless I had a good amount of conviction that this pays out.

Here’s the tldr summary for what’s up

  • Solid financials. Ex: 52% gross profit margins (Square is 28%)
  • Near-100% institutional holdings (equals highly restricted float)
  • Major warrant dilution cancellation catalyst (Sep 10)
  • Multiple major valuations at a 60% upside.
  • IV is dirt poor at 40% .

Part 1 About + Financials

PAYA is a payment processor that has done close to $35bn in payments in 2020, projected $40bn in 2021 and is growing at a fast pace. They work through vendors, resellers, independent sales organizations, developers, etc, etc, etc., and have a bunch of different offerings depending on the sector of business, while their projected upward revenue is intense.

Paya has the lowest price per sales of all its competitors at 5.0 (SHOP is at 48.67 and INTU at 16.51). Gross profit margins are insane at 50.9%, compared to 23.2% for Square (SQ), and 48.4% of Paypal (PYPL). In fact, PAYA has the highest Institutional ownership of all competitors and the highest short interest.

competitors: SQ, PYPL, INTU, SHOP, FISV, PSFE

EDIT: btw PFSE one of PAYA’s closest competitors got totally fucked on ER today

There’s a lot to deep dive into, but it’s solid company. So solid that institutions are picking up as many shares of PAYA as possible. Their recent Q2 ER presentation showed off their stellar earnings growth. It’s hard to name other companies with permanent relevancy that have over a 50% gross profit margin.

Couple highlights

  • $135mil of cash on hand
  • $244mil revenue expected in 2021
  • 25% revenue growth year-over-year realized and projected
  • 42% gross profit margin growth year-over-year realized and projected

Since the economy has reopened, PAYA’s profit margins have only been growing. Unlike most tech companies, they are not a one-and-done situation but will have permanent relevancy in the post-Covid world. In fact, they are a top-20 payment provider in the US.

BTIG, Truist, Cannacord, and Credit Suisse have all given PAYA bullish targets with an average 56% upside. Meanwhile, institutions have just been pouring into this stock and buying more while increasing price targets.

Part 2 Institutional Holdings: +128%

Okay, so this is getting good. So institutions obviously can’t hold more than 100% of shares – this is probably a small error in delayed reporting and maybe some brokers miscounting a handful of tranche locked up shares.

However it is very likely that institutions hold near-100% of all shares. The entire volume over the last 6 weeks since Q2 reporting was only 28 million shares. The largest holder, GTCR didn’t sell a share, Blackrock bought 150% more, and every single other major institution holder that reported for Q2 so far increased their positions.

What does this mean? It means that institutions and funds think this is a valuable AF company and they are holding nearly all outstanding shares. They are jacked. And remember: if nearly all outstanding shares are being held by institutionsthat means the effective float is tiny. This is very important in relation to short interest**.**

Figuring out just how small the float is relevant to figuring out what kind of corner shorts have put themselves in. Luckily we have some good pieces of info to guide us-

  • PAYA tells us there are 121mil shares outstanding in their recent ER.
  • 13Fs/Ds tell us that most institutions are holding and only small funds are trading in and out.
  • FINRA tells us that there are 7.2mil outstanding SI.
  • Price tells us that only 28mil shares were traded in the last 6 weeks since June 30 Q2 reports have been filed with only a net 2.1mil share sell.

If nearly all shares are held by institutions, then obviously the float is highly restricted. Since we know the exact number of shorts via FINRA, we can figure out real short interest in relation to the float at different institutional holding levels.

After all my time in highly illiquid stocks like NEGG and others that can’t be named, it’s obvious PAYA’s float is super tight, and it seems pretty plausible institutional holdings are likely around the 90% range, if not higher. This would correlate to a 60%-118% short percentage of the effective float.

Additionally, from the FTD viewpoint you see a spike in FTDs with the price bleeding up. To me this indicates tight short constraints, and combining with what we already know leads me to the belief that there may be a supply issue. SI doesn’t have to be balls to the wall for it to matter, sometimes supply-side issues are there but not reflected in the raw SI data (e.g. NEGG, AMC). I believe that this is why it is labeled as “Hard-to-Borrow” on TdAmeritrade rn.

I guarantee these shorts don’t realize that their positions are ticking time bombs due to the illiquid nature of the stock. They probably don’t even have a fundamentally negative view of the company and are just actively trading in and out of the stock. Spoiler: it won’t end wellPart 3 Canceled. Warrant dilution

A lot of negative price sentiment came from market pricing in an 18mil eventual share dilution via warrant exercises. This would have been a –15% share dilution of current shareholders.

Surprise.

Turns out PAYA is doing well enough that they are forgoing $200 million to protect share value by buying back their warrants. This is pending a vote due on Sep 10 where they already have 63.5% of “yes” votes.

For those unfamiliar with the process here, I’ll explain. Since PAYA was originally a SPAC, it has warrants. A warrant is basically a call option with a strike price of $11.50 and a 5 year term. As stated in their S1, PAYA originally issued 17.7mil warrants (which would eventually dilute into the stock), however last week they dropped the news that they would be calling for a “cashless redemption” of the warrants at a ratio of .26 shares per warrant, and changing the dilution from the long established 17.7mil to 4.6mil.

This is bullish because

  1. PAYA is saying they don’t need the cash (the 17.7mil warrants exercised would have brought them $204mil)
  2. Instead of the float being diluted by 17.7mil shares, there will now be only 4.6mil shares issued. This is a positive change of +11% which the market has not priced in.
  3. The warrants don’t have an upward cap, and can be bought as high as wanted in relation to the stock.

Part 4 The Short and Long Play

Fair value is at least $16.65 based on analyst coverage, warrant cashless redemption, and fundamental growth profit margins growing at 42% YoY. They provide services that are growing exponentially and will remain in high demand for decades + their stock has received a ridiculous number of valuations all 46% higher than current valuation before the warrant redemption news hit.

There is still an immediate need for the market to react to the warrant redemption. Upside is at least 11% – from current $10.21 to $11.33 just on the news Friday alone (PSA – the options market has not priced this in at all yet) not even factoring in their massive revenue guidance, short coverings, or other catalysts they have lined up.

9/20 10c @ .60 = 733% returns at $11.33 by Sep 10

9/20 12.5c @ .10 = 2400% returns at $15 by Sep 10

11/15 15c @ .15 = 1800% returns at $17.5 in October

This article was written by u/repos39.